Tuesday, October 25, 2016

System Enables Drone Operators to “Sense and Avoid” Other Aircraft

VOLPEUpdated: Thursday, May 26, 2016



In recent years, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)—also known as drones or remotely piloted aircraft—have become an essential alternative to manned aircraft in many applications. Hazardous situations for human pilots in areas such as environmental monitoring, law enforcement, and disaster relief can now be easily mitigated by using UASs.

However, according to a 2014 Volpe report, the number of UASs operating in the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS) will exceed 250,000 by the year 2035. This substantial increase in demand places a tremendous burden on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to maintain critical safety standards for the flying public.



The Challenge

The primary safety concern with UASs is the inability of remote operators to “see and avoid” other aircraft. Federal regulation requires pilots to be aware of all other surrounding aircraft—either visually or using on-board instrumentation—and to safely avoid near-misses or collisions.

Because there is no pilot physically onboard a UAS, remote operators and autonomously operated aircraft must resort to limiting and sometimes impractical means of seeing and avoiding other aircraft, such as ground-based observers or chase aircraft behind the UAS.


The Solution

To address this challenge, Volpe has worked with the U.S. Air Force over the past five years to develop and deploy a low-cost automated solution that enables UAS operators to “sense and avoid” other aircraft.

The ground-based sense and avoid (GBSAA) capability uses existing air traffic data from multiple sources to provide UAS operators with a real-time display of aircraft in the surrounding airspace. GBSAA alerts operators to potential conflicts with neighboring aircraft and recommends avoidance maneuvers for UAS in the event that a conflict does occur.

The primary component of GBSAA is a modified FAA terminal automation system that ingests and displays surrounding aircraft to a UAS operator. GBSAA leverages existing NAS radar equipment and infrastructure to locate these surrounding aircraft, and also has the ability to track “non-cooperative aircraft,” or aircraft lacking electronic means of broadcasting their position or speed.

Since 2011, Volpe engineers and analysts have contributed key technical expertise to the GBSAA initiative, including the following:
Hardware configuration
Software testing
System architecture analysis
Post-demonstration data analysis

Volpe has worked with industry collaborators from the MITRE Corporation, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and Raytheon.

The program began as a proof-of-concept demonstration in Gray Butte, California, and grew into a fully functional system at Cannon Air Force Base (AFB) in New Mexico. The Air Force uses GBSAA for its UAS missions at Cannon AFB to ensure separation and conflict avoidance in relation to civilian air traffic.




The Impact

Volpe’s work on the GBSAA program helped accelerate the safe integration of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace.



The Air Force currently operates UASs in segregated volumes of airspace called military operations areas, which are meant to protect civil aircraft operating in surrounding airspace, but which also reduce the available airspace for these aircraft to fly—in some cases, adding several hundred miles to a preferred route. With GBSAA, the Air Force can begin to routinely operate UAS missions in non-segregated airspace, thereby reducing the size of these military operations areas.

In April 2014, FAA granted the Air Force permission to conduct unimpeded daily UAS operations at Cannon AFB without the use of ground observers or chase aircraft. Volpe has since been supporting the Air Force in identifying and evaluating additional sites across the U.S. for GBSAA deployment, such as Beale AFB in California, Grand Forks AFB in North Dakota, and Wilmington Air Park in Ohio.

The result for civil aircraft is an increase in available airspace, enabling more direct routes and less time and distance flown—while still maintaining critical safety standards for the flying public. An additional benefit is a reduction in overall aviation fuel emissions, as more direct routes typically use less fuel than longer routes.

Read more:

No comments:

Post a Comment