Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

If Drone Swarms Are the Future, China May Be Winning


Why use one drone when you can use one hundred?





popularmechanics.com

By David Hambling
Dec 23, 2016 







Although large Predator and Reaper drones are the face of modern militaries, drone swarms—dozens of fixed-wing drones flying in coordinated formation— could be the future of unmanned combat. And if these aerobatic flock of drones are in our future, then the Chinese believe they're firmly in the lead after releasing a video last month of the largest swarm of fixed-wing drones ever flown.

As you'd expect, a drone swarm's advantage relies on the age-old truism of strength in numbers. Where one missile can knock out a multi-million dollar F-35 (and one mechanical failure can ground it), a swarm can take on casualties and failures and just keep going. If a swarm is big enough, it can overwhelm defenders by attacking with more drones than they can handle.



CURRENTLY ONE MAN CAN CONTROL MULTIPLE DRONES IN THE SYSTEM. IN THE FUTURE, ONE MAN WILL BE ABLE TO CONTROL HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF DRONES,"

In the U.S., the Navy's LOCUST wants to field a swarm of attack drones that would cost collectively less than a single missile, while DARPA works away on its swarming Gremlins and the Air Force's develops miniature drones that can overwhelm air defenses.

"You have maybe 100 or 1,000 surface-to-air missiles," Col. Travis Burdine, the Air Force's division chief for unmanned aircraft, told Flightglobal in April. "But we're going to hit you with 10,000 [small drones]."







CETC

The key to a swarm is that the entire group acts as a single unit, but they're not centrally controlled. Instead, each member of the swarm uses software for coordination that mimics how flocks of birds and schools of fish behave. Currently, military drones like the Reaper are flown individually by a remote pilot, but a single operator could command any number of drones in a swarm. The operator issues a general instruction such as "search this area," and the swarm automatically co-ordinates its individual members to get the job done.

For years, the U.S. appeared to have a clear lead when it came to swarming drones. Last year the Advanced Robotic Systems Engineering Laboratory (ARSENL), claimed a new world record by launching a swarm of 50 drones at Monterey, California, all controlled by the same operator. But at the 11th China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition last month, state-owned China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC) claimed to have shattered that record with a swarm of 67 drones flying together.

"Our swarming drone technology is the top in the world," CETC's Zhang Dengzhou told reporters.






The CETC video (above) shows the drones taking off and maintaining formation, and claims they are capable of networking together in flight and collaborating to carry out intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions. These are key capabilities of a true autonomous swarm which can act without human oversight. But who knows how well the software handles real-world situations.

The final GCI-filled section of the video hints at future ideas for drone swarms, like a "saturation attack" where drones locate an enemy missile launcher and destroy it in a major assault.

The Chinese get more drones in the air because rather than having sophisticated chain-driven launchers like ARSENL (top GIF), their drones take off with what are essentially giant rubber bands (at around 40 seconds in). The number of launchers and the time it takes to reload was one of the limits on the U.S. exercise. It's also one of the reasons why the record for multi-copter swarming drones, which take off vertically without launchers, is much higher – Intel staged a 500-drone lightshow earlier this year.






Although CETC says it's coordinated 67 drones, the video never shows more than 50 drones at a time.
CETC

The Chinese drones in the video have been identified as Skywalker X6s , made by the Skywalker Technology Co. based in Wuhan, China. Skywalker drones are popular among hobbyists as they can be bought in kit form for a few hundred dollars and fitted with custom electronics. ARSENL even used Skywalker X8 drones in their swarm. Skywalker drones are so popular because they're cheap, readily-available, and easy to customize. It's also why ISIS has adapted Skywalker drones to carry bombs.

The surprising thing is that Chinese swarming drones have come out of nowhere. So does this new announcement mean the Chinese are quietly edging ahead in swarm technology? China already makes portable kamikaze drones with explosive warheads, and effective swarming software would allow them to be deployed in large numbers, whether launched from the ground, sea, or air.

"Currently one man can control multiple drones in the system. In the future, one man will be able to control hundreds and thousands of drones," says Zhang.

Although militaries continue finding effective counters to small drones, some suggest that tactical swarms may rule the future battlefield. If that happens, then whoever has the best swarm wins, and China says they're in the lead. Although it's a hard claim to assess, it's a difficult one to ignore.

David Hambling is author of "Swarm Troopers: How small drones will conquer the world"


Read more at:

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

THE PENTAGON'S NEW DRONE SWARM HERALDS A FUTURE OF AUTONOMOUS WAR MACHINES

popsci.com
By Kelsey D. Atherton
January 10, 2017




On Oct. 26, 2016, a pair of Hornets flying above an empty part of California opened their bellies and released a robotic swarm. With machine precision, the fast-moving unmanned flying machines took flight, then moved to a series of waypoints, meeting objectives set for the swarm by a human controller. The brief flight of 103 tiny drones heralds a new age in how, exactly, America uses robots at war.


The Pentagon’s worked with Perdix drones since 2013, with the October flight using the military’s 6th generation of the devices. F/A-18 Hornets, long-serving Navy fighters, carried the drones and released them from flare dispensers. The small drones were the subject of an episode of CBS’s 60 Minutes, and they move so fast they’re hard to film. Below, in a clip from the Department of Defense, the drones are barely visible as dark blurs beneath the fighters.





Captured by telemetry video on the ground, the swarm is clearly visible. First it appears as if from nowhere, moves as one towards a new set of objectives.


This drone swarm was a product of the Strategic Capabilities Office, and outgoing Secretary of Defense Ash Carter praised the work, saying “This is the kind of cutting-edge innovation that will keep us a step ahead of our adversaries. This demonstration will advance our development of autonomous systems.”

Autonomy and swarming are centerpieces in many predictions about the next century of war. The Predator, Reaper, and Global Hawk drones that have so far most embodied how the United States fights wars are big, expensive, and vulnerable machines, with human pilots and sensor operators controlling them remotely. These drones also operate in skies relatively free of threats, without fear that a hostile jet will shoot them down. That’s an approach that’s fine for counterinsurgency battles, an admittedly large part of the wars the Pentagon actually fights, but against a near-peer nation or any foe with sophisticated anti-air or electronic jamming equipment, Reapers are extremely vulnerable targets.

Swarms, where several small flying robots work together to do the same job previously done by a larger craft are one way around that. A few $45,000 anti-air missiles are a cost-effective way to shoot down an $18 million Reaper, but firing that same anti-air missile at a smaller, commercial drone isn’t as effective, especially when there are still 102 other drones flying the same mission at the same time.

Controlling that swarm is where autonomy comes in. With every Predator drone, there’s an actual joystick and flight controls for a human pilot, whose job it is to direct the uncrewed plane and maneuver it. That one-to-one ratio would be impossible to maintain with a small drone swarm, and given that the perdix drone has a listed flight time of “over 20 minutes,” it would be a lot of effort for a very short excursion.

“They are a collective organism, sharing one distributed brain for decision-making and adapting to each other like swarms in nature,” according to Strategic Capabilities Office Director William Roper, before emphasizing that there was a human in the loop. Unlike the Predator, where the machine responds to the pilot’s joystick, this swarm receives objectives from a human controller, and then directs itself to that location. Presumably, the swarm could still fly to a preset list of objectives even if it loses contact with a human controller, giving it the freedom to operate in the face of jamming as well as anti-air weapons.

For now, the autonomous decision making appears limited to where it flies. The Pentagon’s Defense Science Board released a study on military uses of autonomy in the summer of 2015, and mostly found nonlethal uses for self-directed machines. Still, it’s not hard to picture a future where similarly small drones with explosive payloads could receive a command to fly to a given point, and then once there crash into the objective. Developing autonomy is the hard part; turning it into a weapon isn’t. The international community is already considering bans on lethal machines, though deadly machines with some degree of autonomy are already here.

Perdix, as it is, is a breakthrough for autonomy and for swarms, not for lethality. For now, we can admire the maneuvering buzzing swarm of skybots, while still wondering how much human control, exactly, is in the process.

Watch and especially listen to the swarm below. “Drone” has rarely been a more appropriate descriptor.

TAGS:
DRONES
UAVS
DRONE SWARMS
AUTONOMY
AUTONOMOUS MACHINES
PENTAGON
MILITARY


Read more at:
http://www.popsci.com/pentagon-drone-swarm-autonomous-war-machines